You make some good points. However, but I have a question Snaggletooh, are your meds in your country compensated under your government health coverage? In the States its alot different. If you dont have insurance, like me, and you get a bad ear infection a antibiotic pack cost 125$ for generic z-pac. For me antibiotics are a last resort, so I tried a no sugar diet for a couple weeks for free. It actually did work.
Insurance is expensive in the States, If you pay for it on your own, you spend at least 200 dollars a month for a healthy person under 30. But you still have to pay 100% percent of your costs if you have a prexisting condition, for a year before 80% benefits kick in. If you are not lucky enough to have a job with good benefits then you are still paying quite a bit out of pocket.
Also something to think about, Alternative medicines are not just one entity, its several hundreds maybe thousands of companies . Big Pharma, if you follow the trail, is probably a handful of companies. The distribution of wealth is much different if you look at it that way.
To me, its about having a choice, not having to go through western medicine if I don't want to, or combining alternative medicines with standard medical practices. I do not want my choices to be dictated by the government or corporations that lobby the politicians to sway them a certain way.
I also wanted to say, getting back to what we can do. There has been some small amount of positive press about Kratom, the natural news mentioned something not too long ago. The Forbes article, where the reporter says he is going kratom a try,( that story may not have been completely positive but there were positive points to it) positivity should be commented on as much as the negative articles. The post on Current TV could be very helpful if enough people react to it, maybe a news story could come about. I bet Current TV viewing audience is much larger than Longview Washington.
I also think we should be pitching stories to the independent news agencies. Get to them first and tell the other side of the story, so when other reporters search they find positive mentions too. Reporters are like sheep, they want a hot story but don't want to step out of their comfort zone, They follow the safe path. If they see most people say something nasty about a topic, they will follow what their colleagues do.
We haven't, as a group, gotten a chance to tell the positive side of kratom to a larger audience. I think going to the respected independent news agencies like Real News, Raw Story, American Independent News Network, Alternet to name a few, and pitching stories to them, asking for unbiased coverage of Kratom would be beneficial.
There has been negative claims made by the media all based without merit or truth, Yet there are all of us here and others out there that know from personal experience the great benefit of kratom. The negative comments have no evidential backing. But our experience does when enough people report the same findings. So the way I see it, right now it comes down to our word against theirs. They have no evidence. There is still time to get some positive recognition to kratom. We are the best evidence that it improves quality of life. Lets write letters to the independent media and other media outlets that you trust and respect. Lets get the positivity out there.
Thats my two cents anyway
I really believe we could do some good by getting the positive messages out there and reinforcing them when they do happen.